Joshua Dreller, Sr. Director, Content Marketing @ Skai
Joshua Dreller, Sr. Director, Content Marketing @ Skai
Nearly four out of five U.S. digital advertising dollars are spent with walled garden publishers such as Google, Meta, Amazon, and Apple.
To better understand how marketers consider and use walled garden advertising now and in the future, Skai surveyed 117 U.S. marketing professionals. Questions included current and future spending trends, perceived strengths and weaknesses, and considerations for strategic decision-making.
Traditionally, the idea of walled garden advertising has gotten a bit of a bad rap. The term “walled garden” dates back to the 1970s and was originally used to describe the controlling ways in which certain industries controlled all aspects of their ecosystem. For example, at that time, Bell owned every facet of the telephone industry, right down to the telephones themselves, giving them total control.
The advertising industry co-opted the term: today, marketers use walled gardens to refer to giant publishers that control all activity within a few closed ecosystems, such as Google, Meta, Amazon, and Apple.
However, while it may, on the surface, seem as if the high “walls” around audiences on these platforms limit advertisers’ access to data, the truth is evolving to something more beneficial. In the era of data privacy—the walls of walled gardens actually create a safe area to offer targeted advertising without violating user privacy, according to Gartner’s recent report, “Brands Retreat Behind Walled Gardens as Data Privacy Efforts Take Root”:
“Ongoing data privacy disruptions and consumers’ accelerated adoption of digital channels are upending traditional ad placements. Digital marketing leaders should prepare by exploring how leading brands are adapting ad efforts within the walled gardens of YouTube, Amazon, and Facebook.”
Of course, the tradeoff for marketers is that these walls make it increasingly difficult to get data out of the walled gardens. But, given the choice between having hardly any data at all and having strong, reliable data, the decision is clear: walled garden publishers offer a unique opportunity in the era of privacy.
Over the years, advertisers’ main argument in favor of open web advertising is the fact that the walls of walled gardens shut marketers out of the data collection process. Giant publishers, some argued, are more than willing to accept all the data marketers can provide but rarely send back even a fraction of their data to marketers.
Those high walls that they can’t see over have prompted marketers to worry about issues such as targeting transparency (who is really being targeted?), ad serving verification (how many impressions are really shown?), and biased measurement (how effective is my investment?).
But, the world has changed over the last few years, now making the walls of walled gardens advantageous to marketers. Consumer data privacy regulations limit marketers’ ability to run advanced tactics on the open web and impact many useful advertising tools, including ad targeting, personalization, retargeting, measurement, optimization, etc.
With their high walls protecting logged-in users, it’s possible that soon, these “enclosed ecosystems” will be the last haven for advertisers to continue running their advanced tactics. In fact, according to Skai’s recent survey of 117 U.S. marketing professionals on their current use and future plans for walled garden advertising, nearly 70% of marketers report that practitioners will move more budgets to walled gardens as a way to adapt to privacy challenges.
Over the last two years, one of the biggest advertising stories has been the rise of signal loss brought upon by the shift in consumer data tracking. Marketers have been dealing with curveballs such as Apple’s ATT privacy policy, which prompts users to opt-in to data collection rather than giving the option to opt-out in their device’s settings as was previously the policy. Furthermore, the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) and changes to laws in California mean that websites must ask for permission to use cookies. As the data that used to be so widely available to marketers becomes increasingly hard to come by, personalization and targeting likewise become increasingly difficult.
The logged-in user base of walled garden publishers was already a market advantage in the first two decades of digital advertising. As we enter the era of privacy, many technologies that help advertisers outside of walled gardens that use third-party cookies will become less effective moving forward.
As the industry struggles to find a new unified ID, the walled gardens already have inherently future-proof cookieless solutions. Walled garden publishers can target, personalize, and measure massive audiences of logged-in users based on the data those users provide voluntarily.
And the advertising solutions that walled garden publishers offer can help marketers in myriad ways:
Better use of first-party data: In a cookieless world, first-party data, which users share voluntarily, is crucial for successful personalization. Walled garden publishers allow advertisers to take their own first-party data, such as email lists, and upload it to find both existing and lookalike customers.
Free, out-of-the-box native audiences: While third-party audience vendors offer segments for a price, walled garden publishers offer rich audience segments which marketers can use for free when targeting ads. Publishers like Facebook and Amazon have access to a wealth of data about user interests, behavior, and demographics, which advertisers can use for targeting while still respecting privacy.
Accurate, interchannel measurement: Cross-device measurement has long been a challenge for marketers hoping to create a holistic, omnichannel approach to advertising. However, publishers like Amazon and Google have unique insights into how advertising resonates with users across devices throughout their buyer journey.
The walls of walled gardens are certainly not designed to keep advertisers out. This year, the majority of digital ad spend, nearly 81%, will go to a handful of publishers. One of the benefits of so much ad spending going to the walled gardens is that those few publishers are more incentivized to adapt to the new needs of marketers to keep those investments coming their way.
A great example of this adaptability came a few years ago when Google and Facebook changed their policies to enable ads to be directed to retailers rather than forcing advertisers to point ad traffic to their owned properties. Shortly after, Amazon launched Amazon Attribution, which enables marketers to measure the impact of those search and social ads which drive to its store.
These two innovations are changing how advertisers approach online commerce marketing, and with so much of advertisers’ resources and attention focused on walled garden advertising, chances are, these innovations are just the beginning.
To find out more about why so many marketers are investing in walled garden advertising, read our full report.
Skai is the only omnichannel marketing platform for performance advertising. We’re helping marketers connect the walled gardens across retail media, paid search, paid social, and app marketing, making true omnichannel performance marketing a reality. We’ll keep you at the forefront of the digital evolution with data and insights, marketing execution, and measurement tools that work together to drive powerful brand growth.
Please schedule a quick demo for more information on Skai’s or to see our platform in action.
Even if you’re not ready just yet, staying on top of what’s available is always a good idea. We look forward to working with you!
We use cookies on our website. Some of them are essential, while others help us to improve this website and your experience.
Here you will find an overview of all cookies used. You can give your consent to whole categories or display further information and select certain cookies.